coverity complained about scanf(line + flen, ...; claiming that flen was tainted, since it was read from user input. If a user had control over flen, he had random read access to memory. Actually flen was checked against llen, so this shouldn't have been possible. But coverity still complained Merging both scanf is both more efficient and hopefully removes the coverity warning at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fenkart andreas.fenkart@dev.digitalstrom.org